Could Debris of an Ancient Spaceship have caused the Anomalous Australasian Tektite Strewn Field?

Although I am fine with not having any absolute proof regarding many of the articles on this website (at least at this stage (1,2)), it can be tempting to search for some at times. This is one of those article that explores geological findings and compares them with information from ‘galactic’ sources. Keep on reading if you want to watch this intriguing dance unfold between Alcheringa and the Australasian Tektites.

The Australasian Tektites and their Strewn Field (13)

THE ALCHERINGA ACCOUNT
We have spoken about this intriguing Alcheringa account a couple of times. I recommend reading an introduction at (8). Within the Alcheringa framework a spaceship would have arrived on the ‘shores’ of our planet some 900,000 years ago, with about 50,000 people on board. Unfortunately a tragedy would have occurred: nearly all of the inhabitants would have been killed by malevolent species that are said to have used a particular weapon that could ‘melt’ the spaceship.

A very small number of people would have been able to escape to Earth in pods or scout ships, but the spaceship itself would have melted completely and much of the debris would have ended up on our planet. In another article you can read about how survivors of this crash would have managed to introduce a new genetic strain to the existing ‘hairy ones’ at the time. The timing matches remarkably to a sudden increase of brain size around that time in our history (9).

OTHER GEOLOGICAL EXPLORATIONS
Wouldn’t it be fascinating if we could actually find some possible remnants of the debris of that ancient crash that might have occurred hundreds of millennia ago? Before we discuss a very serious candidate I would first like to remind you of two other articles where we used some geological data. Fairly recently we examined the possibility that the Holocene might have been triggered by a huge meteor that was dropped by someone with rather bad intentions on what we currently call ‘Greenland’ (10).

Some 65 million years earlier we are told that another meteor would have caused the extinction of the dinosaurs. We present two alternative theories about what could have happened back then based on both extraterrestrial and intra-terrestrial sources (11,12). Could that thin geological iridium layer be the result of something else than just a meteor?

BRUCE FENTON’S SEARCH FOR SCIENTIFIC BACKUP FOR THE ALCHERINGA ACCOUNT
It was the researcher Bruce Fenton (14,15) who decided to see if there was anything to be found in the scientific literature that could provide some backup to this extraordinary Alcheringa story. He eventually found three separate scientific clues. We already discussed a genetic element in another article (9). Now we focus on the second clue, related to the Australasian Tektites. Let’s start off with a piece from Bruce Fenton himself:

Fenton on the open mystery surrounding the Australasian Tektites (16)

In the above excerpt Fenton says that he was surprised to see so much correlations with scientific evidence. When it comes to the Australasian Tektites he says: “It turned out that around about 790,000 years ago-ish, that there was indeed a mysterious rain of silica debris that fell along a 12,000 kilometer long path from China all the way down to Antarctica. And there’s a mysterious phenomena called the Australasian Tektite-Strewn Field, which has been 130 years of research, still considered an open mystery.” (16)

AUSTRALASIAN TEKTITES AS NOVEL DISTAL EJECTA FROM ASTEROID
It is good to know that there seems to be consensus on the age of these glassy stones: 790,000 years ago (17). In order to seriously consider the extraordinary possibility that the Australasian Tektite Strewn field might actually be the result of the debris of some ancient spaceship, we need to be able to reasonably question the most popular explanation, namely that there was a meteor strike that led to the creation of ejected earth-surface material, that later fell back to Earth to cause the strewn field (18).

Australasian tektites (19)

COMPARING THE CURRENT CONSENSUS AND THE ALCHERINGA PERSPECTIVES
In his paper, Fenton presents many anomalies when it comes to the nature of the Australasian tektites. He says that the composition of the tektites makes it clear that these tektites cannot be from an asteroid since they don’t match typical solar system materials. The constitution of the tektites also make it unlikely that they are simply the result of earth crust material alterations (20). The high homogeneity of the glass also is hard to explain with the current consensus, because it would take a relatively long time to form this, longer than what you would expect within the distal ejecta of the impact of the meteor.

The strewn field is unusually large and patterned. This fits better with a low-velocity, smaller angle entry than with a huge meteor strike and secondary earth crust material re-entries. If it would have been a huge meteor that could cause such a strewn field, you would expect a huge crater, too. No crater has been identified.

MY TALK TO GROK ON THESE ALCHERINGA MATTERS
I decided to discuss the paper with Grok and this turned out to be very enlightening (21). No matter what arguments I provided, Grok was able to defend the current scientific consensus with what seems reasonable arguments. The gist of the defense was that all the composition anomalies can be explained because of the extremely high velocity and subsequent heat caused by the meteor impact, that would have melted the earth crust material (mostly silica-rich). The lack of any crater is explained away by saying that it has all happened so long ago that nature had covered it up during those hundreds of thousands of years.

Since I am nog geologist I was unable to counter all these arguments, and after a while I noticed that this was going nowhere. I then decided to turn the tables: I asked Grok to defend Fenton’s hypothesis and he soon ended up admitting that his ‘artificial megastructure’ theory could perfectly explain all the anomalies related to the Australasian tektites as well.

A dramatized image of a Melting and burning spaceship (23)

SOME REFLECTIONS
The strength of the Alcheringa account is not only the vast number of people who have all pieced together this alleged extraterrestrial turn of events some 900,000-800,000 years ago (8). Fenton has uncovered three elements that provide intriguing correlation to this account that are all dated around that time in history: there seems to be no discussion of the dating of both the genetic (brain) upgrade (9) and the event that caused the Australasian Tektites to form. We will discuss the third element in another separate article.

Perhaps we can someday uncover more information related to these intriguing events. There must be mention of this somewhere in these libraries from the Galactic Federation of Worlds, wouldn’t it? It is obvious that this account doesn’t fit neatly within Enki’s account of our history.

What are your thoughts? Share them in our Study Group (22).

FOOTNOTES
(1) I think that not having absolute proof for extraterrestrial life at this moment in time, is a part of the disclosure process. I prefer to believe that a slow disclosure process with all kinds of circumstantial evidence is way more constructive. In that sense documentaries like the ‘Age of Disclosure‘ (3) are very useful.
(2) Dan Willis has gathered a list of ‘soft’ evidence regarding the information from Elena Danaan. You can find it here: Analysis of information provided by Elena Danaan
(3) You can find a few fragments from the documentary ‘Age of Disclosure’ in the following articles: (4-7).
(4) On the Relative Size of Some Spaceships: Small from the Outside, but Huge from Within
(5) ‘Only Crazy People Talk About Extraterrestrials’
(6) How Religious Concepts can Prevent People from Exploring Extraterrestrial Life
(7) Did the GFW reduce the Radioactivity Level near the Chernobyl Reactor with 70 percent in 1986?
(8) The Alcheringa Account by Valerie Barrow – Part 1 – The Destruction of the Rexegena
(9) A Brain-increasing Genetic Intervention some 800,000 years ago?
(10) Did Enlil’s Asteroid Cause the Hiawatha Crater in Greenland?
(11) Discovery of an Ancient Crystal Artefact Containing Info that is 65 million years Old
(12) Did a Fusion Bomb cause the Extinction of the dinosaurs 65 Million years ago?
(13) Map of the Australasian tektite strewn field
(14) Fenton, B. (2022) Australasian Tektites as Interstellar Object Debris: Anomalies in Composition, Formation and Distribution
(15) Fenton, B (2022) Exogenesis: hybrid humans
(16) What are the Tjuringa Transmissions and why did we set up the Alien Technosignatures Research Group
(17) Schwarz et. al. (2016) Coeval ages of Australasian, Central American and Western Canadian tektites reveal multiple impacts 790 ka ago
(18) Fenton writes: “The current popular consensus theory describes the Australasian tektites as novel distal ejecta produced during an oblique angled hypervelocity asteroid impact event occurring somewhere in Indochina.” (14)
(19) Australasian Tektites
(20) Fenton mentions all kinds of characteristics of the tektites that neither make them qualify for being the result of an asteroid, nor solely from the melted ground or rock that was hit by this alleged asteroid. He mentions the silica/aluminum balance, the extreme lack of osmium, deviating oxygen and strontium isotopes and the presence of lechatelierite (14, 21).
(21) A Grok Discussion on Fenton’s Australasian Tektites articles
(22) Telegram groups: Galactic Anthropology (general updates), Galactic Anthropology Study Group (most active group with hundreds of separate discussion topics) Alex Collier Study Group and the Galactic Anthropology Library. Elena Danaan also has her own telegram channel and even her own open telegram chat group. Dr. Salla also runs a Telegram Group. Do you want to help with studying and exposing the Deep State? Join the Gondolath Globalist Narratives Study Group or visit the website: Gondolath Project. You can also follow the alternative side of current events at the Laura Aboli Archive. There’s also a Diddy and Epstein group. Galactic Anthropology tries to spread both the disclosure information and the Deep State Explorations at FacebookX (Twitter), on VKYoutube and on TikTok. Hope to see you soon in one of the groups! Like, share and subscribe.
(23) The fire seems unlikely in space where there is a lack of oxygen. This image is just made to illustrate the general concept. The weapon that could cause a spaceship to melt would better fit the space circumstances. Image created with the assistance of Grok.






A Brain-increasing Genetic Intervention some 800,000 years ago?

( PortugueseРусский )

A few weeks ago I ran into a research paper by Dr. Rempel who had found some odd non-parental genomes in certain children (1). I was made aware of his research by another researcher, called Bruce Fenton, who had found my work while searching for the term ‘Alcheringa’ (2). It turns out that he and his wife Daniella are the authors of several books (3-5), that contain intriguing new concepts related to our possible extraterrestrial genetic heritage. This article provides an introduction to one of these fascinating theories related to some strange genetic changes that would have taken place some 800,000 years ago, that would have miraculously increased the size of our brains.

What caused our brains to ‘inflate’ suddenly, 800,000 years ago?

THE ALCHERINGA ACCOUNT BY VALERIE BARROW
In June 2024 I wrote an introduction to a remarkable book by the Australian Valerie Barrow, called Alcheringa: when the first ancestors were created (2). Barrow describes how her contact with an ancient Aboriginal stone triggered an extraordinary communication and an avalanche of memories from quite a large group of people living in Australia (6).

These would all link back to a period many hundreds of thousands of year ago when extraterrestrial visitors would have altered our genomes, after a disastrous attack in space that ruined their Rexegena spaceship and killed off the vast majority of the people aboard.

There is a lot to be said about this account, and I would advise you to read the book yourself or start off with an extensive summary of the book that I have written in the GA Study Group (8).

THREE FIELDS OF EVIDENCE
Bruce Fenton was intrigued by the book and wanted to see if there was any physical evidence to back up this account that is highly deviating from our current shared reality perspective. In a video he provides compelling evidence for two of these domains, that we will discuss in other future articles (9). For now I want to focus on the genetic evidence that he discovered. In the video below Fenton names three mutations that took place, and all these changes would be linked to the period from 750,000 to 800,000 years ago.

Bruce Fenton describes three categories of genetic mutations that occurred about 800,000 years ago (9)


RADICAL CHANGE IN WHAT USED TO BE CALLED ‘JUNK DNA’
The first change concerns changes in what scientists have begun to call ‘non-coding genes’. These are the genes that were considered to be ‘junk DNA’ in the past, because they didn’t directly code for the creation of proteins. It has been discovered that many of these non-coding genes play a pivotal role during the development of the foetus.

Fenton describes how one of these ‘non-coding genes’, called HAR1 (14) had hardly changed during the evolution from a chicken to the chimpansee (if you believe in this evolution theory, we have discussed other options, like animals being imported from other star systems (10)), but there were many changes from the shift from chimpansee to modern day human.

In a period of 300 million years there were only 2 mutations between the chicken and the chimpansee in this HAR1-element, whereas there were 18 (!) changes in only 7 million years between the chimpansee and a human being. This is highly illogical, seen from a evolutionary perspective.

VERY EFFECTIVE DELETIONS OF GENE CODES (11)
Then Bruce continues with another anomaly that was found, namely the complete removal of certain genetic codes, called ‘human conserved deletions‘. Somehow highly conserved DNA was mysteriously deleted, but these removals caused our brains to develop as they have. These changes would also have occurred in the same period.

A woman altering a DNA-strand

THE FOLDING OF GENOMES
And then finally there is this awkward phenomenon that certain genomes started to fold, which allowed for new combinations to occur, and these combinations also turned out to play a crucial role in the development of our brain. What is remarkable about this highly effective folding is that it would have occurred in one single generation; as if only one sperm or egg-cell had changed.

SOME REFLECTIONS
As Bruce says in the featured video, there are a few funny things going on here. First we have all these genetic changes that don’t appear to be random at all, as you would expect when looking at the world from a Darwinian perspective. They seem to be highly directed. All these changes would also have taken place in the same period about 800,000 years ago.

So, how to explain this? How to explain Intelligent genetic mutations that caused our brains to grow, enabling humnanity to distinguish itself from the primates. It cannot be explained by random mutations, so that would leave us with two other alternatives (as was said in another video with Bruce Fenton, see his Telegram group (12)), namely that it was done by God or by extraterrestrials.

The Alcheringa account does provide a neat explanation that roughly fits with that period. The Alcheringa hypothesis gains more ground because of other evidence related to events described in the book. If you can’t wait for me to write articles about these other compelling evidence, you can hear Bruce Felton talk about it in the related YouTube video (9).

I would invite anyone who is interested in exploring this galactic material to join one Felton’s group (12) or one of our groups on Telegram (13).

FOOTNOTES
(1) Exploring Possible Extraterrestrial Gene-insertions
(2) The Alcheringa Account by Valerie Barrow – Part 1 – The Destruction of the Rexegena
(3) Exogenesis: Hybrid Humans: A Scientific History of Extraterrestrial Genetic Manipulation
(4) The Forgotten Exodus: The Into Africa Theory of Human Evolution
(5) Hybrid Humans: Scientific Evidence of Our 800,000-Year-Old Alien Legacy 
(6) Here’s a group image of the people involved with the retrieval of this ancient story about this ‘seeding’ of humanity by the people from the Rexegena spaceship some 800,000 years ago.

Image taken from Valerie Barrow’s Alcheringa book (7)

(7)  Alcheringa – When the First Ancestors Were Created: Ancient Aliens in Australia (English Edition) or Epub Version (8)
(8) You can read an Extended Telegram thread on Alcheringa. It includes a link to the ePub Version of the book. This thread is not only filled with links to related articles on Galactic Anthropology, but it also contains interactions and thoughts from other people in the group.
(9) What are the Tjuringa Transmissions and why did we set up the Alien Technosignatures Research Group
(10) From which Planets do our Animals Originate?
(11) I couldn’t help but think of Gene Decode, when I wrote the words ‘Gene Codes’. We have a separate thread for the work of Gene Decode in our Galactic Anthropology Study Group, see: Gene Decode Information
(12) Alien Technosignatures Research Group on Telegram
(13) Telegram groups: Galactic Anthropology (general updates), Galactic Anthropology Study Group (most active group with hundreds of separate discussion topics) Alex Collier Study Group and the Galactic Anthropology Library. Elena Danaan also has her own telegram channel and even her own open telegram chat group. Dr. Salla also runs a Telegram Group. Do you want to help with studying the Deep State? Join the Gondolath Globalist Narratives Study Group or visit the website: Gondolath Project. You can also follow the alternative side of current events at the Laura Aboli Archive. We recently started a Diddy and Epstein group as well. Galactic Anthropology tries to spread both the disclosure information and the Deep State Explorations at FacebookX (Twitter), on VKYoutube and on TikTok. Hope to see you soon in one of the groups! Like, share and subscribe.
(14) For more information on HAR1 see this grok explanation.