The site you are now reading is built mainly upon the information from Dr. Michael Salla, Elena Danaan and occasionally from Alex Collier. Sometimes a few other sources pass by but the core of this site is based on their information. In the past I used to read channeled messages from certain people and I really thought I resonated with that information. Wouldn’t it have been nice if everything from those books would fit perfectly with the current information? Unfortunately that doesn’t seem to be the case and I wonder what to do with this.

As far as I know I do not have the ability to check for myself what is true and what is not, although I can decide what seems more plausible and what not. Internal consistency is an important element in this: if one source says A on day 1, it cannot say the opposite on day 15 without a serious explanation. So far the information from Elena Danaan really is consistent and I am very much inclined to take her work very seriously. In fact I take it that seriously that I have created this site in order to create more order in all that information, often found only in certain videos and books.

I also don’t want to spend too much time comparing and reading through older channeled information to see what matches and what doesn’t. It can already be quite time consuming to keep up with all the actual information provided by Danaan and Salla. On the other hand I don’t want to ignore everything that doesn’t coincide with this information. So what to do?

PICKING OUT CERTAIN RELEVANT ELEMENTS
For now I want to select a few items from certain books in order to see what is different (or what coincides). If the amount of conflicting information from certain sources is turning big that might question the validity of the source altogether. Particular topics can prove to be useful in determining its position in comparison with the information that would come from the Galactic Federation of Worlds and a number of whistleblowers.

EXAMPLE: NAMES OF SIRIAN STARS
In an earlier article (2) I presented the list that Elena Danaan had provided in one of her videos (3). This list had a column of the names we give to stars and planets and the names the ‘locals’ give to their own stars and planets. In a nice video from January 2022 Elena talks about how you could use this information to check whether the channeled being you are in contact with, really is the one he says he is (4). Take for example that some entity claims that he is from the Pleiades. You might want to ask them what their name is for the star he comes from, or what the name is of the planet he lives on. And of course he shouldn’t use the names that we humans have given those stars.

Elena also points out that there actually are regressive reptilians living on a particular planet orbiting the Pleiadian star Alcyone; in other words: not everything from the Pleiades is heavenly 🙂

In the book ‘The New Sirian Revelations’ (see image above) the Sirian High Council shares its information with Patricia Cori. In chapter three of that book the local names of the three stars of Sirius are given; and guess what? These names are different from the names that Danaan has presented. Let’s read a bit along:

“We are three primary Speakers of the Sirian High Council, coming to you from the midway of the sixth dimension, specifically from the heightened emanations of our ascended star, Satais (identified by your astronomers as Sirius B), which holds resonance at this dimensional frequency” (5, 33)

…”Of the three sister stars that comprise our multidimensional, interstellar family, Sothis (Sirius A) is the only one that remains anchored in the universe of matter” (5, p.33)

“The third Sirian star, Anu (Sirius C) ascended to the fourth dimension, and has yet to move beyond it.” (5, p.34)

SOME FINAL COMMENTS
As a plain physical three dimensional human being it can be tricky to compare information from a sixth dimensional group with that from the Galactic Federation of Worlds. I might just oversee certain things that are beyond my comprehension. In the above examples our names ‘Sirius A, B and C’ are called Sothis, Satais and Anu, whereas Elena Danaan says they are called resp. Ashkera, Thula and Emerya (2).

Perhaps there is a different name for a star when it has become sixth-dimensional? And what about the fourth dimensional star Anu? Danaan does say that The Anunnaki stem from a star system that is from a different dimension with the name Immaru, which is different from Anu (6).

Well, so much for this example. I guess I will present a few other examples in articles to come, but not too many because it can unnecessarily complicate matters (7). I don’t want to lose my focus. If you have any thoughts on this, please add a comment below.

LINKS
(1) Viral Remedies
(2) The Real Names of Various Stars – How they are called by their own People
(3) The Name of the Stars (Youtube) June 6, 2021
(4) Tips to know whose ET’s you are dealing with – Jan 29, 2022
(5) Cori, P. (2017) The New Sirian Revelations. Berkeley, California: North Atlantic Books.
(6) Nibiru, the Planet of the Anunnaki in the Immaru Star System
(7) You just have to think about all the complications around Megan Rose (8)
(8) On Communication Distortions and the Unfortunate Departure of M.R. from the Crew