Reflecting on a Galactic-proof Christianity

In our study group (1) we started an interesting discussion on ways to prepare religions for this possible realization that we are far from alone in this universe. That there are indeed infinite amounts of people and species in numerous forms living in countless star systems and that we are only one of the them. What would such a realization mean for institutionalized religions? How would religions like Christianity, Judaism or Islam deal with such a paradigm shift? And what about Buddhism and Hinduism? Would they perhaps be better prepared? How ‘galactic-proof’ are religions?

This article reflects on a few issues related to this question, as a starter for more to come. Wouldn’t it be great if we could find ways to pick the beautiful and wise elements from religions, and leave behind the distortion, in order to prepare ourselves for this huge new realization? Perhaps this could help in bridging the minds of Christians to incorporate this galactic-proof variant? And, who knows, perhaps we can offer some wisdom to those visiting our shores from our religions?

ANGELS AND DEMONS
In an earlier article from 2025 we touched upon one aspect related to this question of how to incorporate extraterrestrial life into the people who have been raised as a Christian (2). In March 2026, Vice President J.D. Vance shared his ideas about extraterrestrials, who he thought probably were some kind of demons (2).

THE BIBLE
When thinking about Christianity, the Bible is a logical place to look when you want to learn more this religion. Unfortunately there is a lot of discussion on the Bible and the various books in it. It seems to be a rather arbitrary selection that was made a few hundred years after the life of Jesus Christ (3).

So we have a number of books that made to the next round, and a number that didn’t. We also have books that are linked to the so-called Ethiopian bible too. We talked a bit about 1 Enoch in a recent article on the 200 Fallen, for instance (4). Then there also are all kinds of interpretations by Christian mythics (1) that didn’t end up in the Bible.

On top of all that we have the differences between all kinds of denominations and interpretations. We have the Protestants, Catholics, Jehova’s etc. For an outsider I think it would look quite messy. When it comes to the bible there are also are various translations and of course there is this distinction between the Old Testament and the New Testament.

THE ALL-OR-NOTHING PHENOMEMON
When studying perspectives it is useful to be able to study certain elements separately. Take for instance the paradigm of Elena Danaan: she has said a lot of things, and I like to analyze them separately; it could be that certain elements are more reasonable than others, and for me there is no need to either ‘believe’ everything or nothing (5). It seems that within religions this is not as easy. It feels as if there is a ‘package’ that you either accept or not. There is no in-between.

It’s a bit like what Joan Osborne sang in her song ‘One of Us’: “If God had a face, what would it look like, and would you want to see, if seeing meant that you would have to believe in things like heaven, and in Jesus and the saints, and all the prophets?” (6)

This ‘all-or-nothing’ -phenomenon makes it hard to talk to certain people within the Christian community. When someone would open up to discarding a certain element within their religion, it might easily imply that it is a kind of blasphemy. A true Christian doesn’t question anything that is written in the Bible.

SOME CHRISTIAN ELEMENTS
Having said all this, I am going to share a few elements that many would link to Christianity and their belief system, or theory. People who are open to evaluating certain separate elements can decide which element they like and which they don’t. It can also be a good way to wonder how ‘galactic-proof’ or ‘extraterrestrial-proof’ these elements are. Would they still be valuable once a civilization has embraced the reality of extraterrestrial life and a universe filled with people and ‘gods’?

I am no Theological Scholar; my aim is to just introduce a few elements and wonder how ‘galactic-proof’ and valuable they are

The Ten Commandments (8)
  • Holy Trinitiy – The Trinity is one of the central and most distinctive doctrines in Christianity.
    Main Concept in Simple Terms: The Trinity teaches that there is one God who eternally exists as three distinct Persons: God the Father, God the Son (Jesus Christ) God the Holy Spirit. These three are not three separate gods, but one single God in three Persons. They are co-equal, co-eternal, and of the same divine essence (substance) (7).
  • Love other people like you love yourself
  • An angry god that casts the first two people out of Eden where he curses them both because they were disobedient and wanted to eat from the tree of Knowledge (to learn the difference between what is right and what is wrong)
  • A God that has designated a group of people as his chosen people
  • A God that has flooded the complete world in order to do a reset
  • The Concept of a ‘Son of God’ that dies on a Cross and then resurrects after three days to finally ascend with body and all to the skies.
  • The concept that Jesus has died for our sins.
  • The Ten Commandments (9)

SOME REFLECTIONS
I could add a lot of other Christian elements to the whole, and I want to invite people to add a few more positive ones, but I have to say that I really wonder what elements really are galactic-proof? The god from the Old Testament comes across as a jealous, aggressive and angry god who threatens, curses and kills his people. A god that wants to make sure that his people follow him, and not some other god. (10) Fear seems to be a common theme. The god in the New Testament sounds a lot better. Perhaps a good first step to make Christianity ‘galactic-proof’ would be to discard much of the Old Testament?

What are your thoughts? How to make Christianity ready for the extraterrestrial age?

FOOTNOTES
(1) On Catholicism, Christianity and Disclosure (a thread in the Galactic Anthropology Study Group on Telegram)
(2) How Religious Concepts can Prevent People from Exploring Extraterrestrial Life
(3) The Council of Nicaea and the Formation of the Biblical Canon
(4) On the Removal of the 200 Ciakahrr-Anachim from Earth in 2026
(5) I like to not ‘believe’ anything when it comes to the articles on Galactic Anthropology. I am only studying the likelihood of certain perspectives and ideas, and what could the benefits of entertaining these extraterrestrial concepts to better understand certain possibilities.
(6) Joan Osborne – One Of Us
(7) https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNQ_22175f7b-83c1-4c90-a1d3-cc1c8453fc81
(8) God Rules
(9) Here are the first two in the longer version from the bible:
– 1 – “I am the Lord your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. You shall have no other gods before Me.
– 2- You shall not make for yourself a carved image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth; you shall not bow down to them nor serve them. For I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children to the third and fourth generations of those who hate Me, but showing mercy to thousands, to those who love Me and keep My Commandments.

Exodus 20:2-17 NKJV (The Ten Commandments)
(10) We have spoken about the Old-testament god a few times before and I wouldn’t be surprised if that god turns out to be have been some malicious Anunnaki god. See (11-13) for more on this.
(11) Is it Blasphemous to say God is an Alien?
(12) Some Doubts about the Enlil-Yahweh-vibe
(13) Anu, Enlil and Enki and the Meeting with the Four Councils





Two Extraterrestrial Perspectives on Jesus Christ – Yeshua

( Два внеземных взгляда на Иисуса Христа — Иешуа )

In earlier articles we spent some time on the god from the Old Testament. We raised some doubts about the vengeful nature of that god (1), we wondered if you could consider is blasphemous to say that God was an alien (2), and of course there was this link with the Anunnaki half brothers Enki and Enlil, the latter probably responsible for most of the hardships that humanity has suffered the last couple of hundreds of thousands of years (3,4).

So, the various roles of the biblical god were dubious to say the least. According to Elena Danaan both Enki and Enlil were sometimes referenced in the bible as being god. Enki would have been the god who created Adam and Eve through genetic engineering of the then present primates (5), he would have tried to save the people from the flood, whereas Enlil would have been the one that would actually have created the floods (3).

Jesus with Thumbs Up

But what about the main player in the New Testament? What to say about Jesus Christ from an Extraterrestrial point of view? In this article I want to start off with this question by providing two perspectives: the one that we can found in the work of Elena Danaan and the one that is given by the Thiaoouba as they were encountered by the French contactee Michel Desmarquet

JESUS CHRIST AND ENKI
In the Seeders (7) Elena dedicates a short chapter to Jesus and his bloodline. I would advise you to read that chapter to get a more detailed perspective. Elena argues that Jesus’ mother Mary would have been part of a bloodline that would go all the way back to Enki’s Adam.

She builds her argument on the Doctrina Jacobi (6) which was written in 634. She writes: “Some notable points in Mary’s lineage are that she was a descendant of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob…significantly Luke traces Mary’s lineage all the way back to Adam (verse 38)” (8)

As we have learned Enki would have created humanity out of the primate that contained the genomes of 11 star races from other galaxies (9) some 370,000 years ago. This account of Jesus’ bloodline implies that this bloodline managed to survive 368,000 years to finally flow through the veins of Jesus Christ (9)

THE CONCEPTION OF JESUS
On the way of the conception of Jesus, Elena shares a few thoughts too. Let’s read along:

Regardless of Mary’s specific lineage, that Jesus is a descendant of David and Judah is beyond doubt. My conclusion on that, is the suggestion that Mary, carrier of the royal Enki bloodline, was abducted in the aim of reinforcing the off-world genetic lineage via artificial fertilization. Would these elements alone, among many others, be the reason why the extraterrestrials themselves kept the true history of Earth hidden from Humanity for such a long time, until we are ready to hear it without losing our minds? ” (7, p.517)

In Enki’s account of our history and Elena Danaan’s analysis the Anunnaki and especially Enki plays a pivotal role in the genetic characteristics of Jesus. Mary’s egg would have been infertilized artificially by off world people. This couldn’t have been Enki since Enki had already left some 9,600 years earlier after Enlil flooded the whole place (3). This is another question that needs to be answered in the future: who added whose genes to Mary’s egg in this account of Jesus’ heritage? (17)

THE THIAOOUBA VARIANT
I have come to admire the information that was given to another French contactee, namely Michel Desmarquet. In his book ‘The Thiaoouba Prophecy’ he describes how he was taken in a spaceship by people from a planet called Thiaoouba to their home world. I was inspired to write a few articles based on this perspective which seems to be partially at odds with Enki’s account of our history (11-13). It turns out that the Thiaoouba also have an interesting perspective on Jesus.

Pregnant Mary (15)

In the historical accounts of the Thiaoouba the Anunnaki are not mentioned at all. According to them the Asian and Black races came from a planet called Bakaratini some 1,3 million years ago (12) and another race colonized Mu about 250,000 years ago (13). When talking about Jesus they are clear as well: Jesus came from Thiaoouba.

Let’s hear about their account. Here’s Thao talking to Michel:

Our plan was to capture public imagination by sending a messenger of peace. The story of the birth of Jesus, as you know it, with the Virgin Mary as mother, is quite true. The appearance of an angel at the Annunciation is correct in every detail. We sent a spaceship and one of us appeared before the virgin, who was indeed a virgin, telling her she was going to become pregnant. The embryo was implanted in her while she was under hypnosis.” (14, p.140)

As you can see the bloodline of Mary seemed unimportant, since she was not artificially impregnated in the way that is described by Elena Danaan. A whole complete embryo is put into Mary’s womb, making Mary more like a surrogate mother, not having any direct genetic link with her son, Jesus.

According to the Thiaoouba, his mission was to impart a message of love and goodness – ‘love one another’ and also to enlighten the people in regard to the reincarnation of astral bodies and immortality. This was all distorted by priests in the time that followed and numerous disagreements led to the rise of the many sects which claim to follow the teachings of Christ. (14, p.145)

In order to retain complete control of their mission a being from Thiaoouba, called Aarioc, cast off his (hermaphrodite) body to enter into a human being, which was created by the Thiaoouba, which allowed him to fully hold on to all the knowledge and abilities from their home world, like resuscitating the dead and curing the blind and the deaf.

SOME CONCLUDING THOUGHTS
Well, what to think of all this? I guess we should ask Jesus himself to get the final answers on what really happened. Both accounts agree on the virgin birth of Jesus. They also both stress the importance of Jesus Christ in human history and the role of extraterrestrials in his birth. In Enki’s account the Anunnaki play an important role through their bloodline and through their artificial impregnation of Mary with unknown genomes (16).

This probably allowed Jesus to perform his miracles. In Thiaoouba’s account Jesus was able to do this because he was fully made by the Thiaoouba’s with all their qualities (except their hermaphrodite character). Both physically and with a Thiaoouba ‘soul’. We don’t get any specifics about the origin of the soul of Jesus in Elena’s account, at least not yet (17).

There sure are a lot of pieces of the puzzle still missing, but I’m confident that one day it will all be made clear to us. Let me know your thoughts on this.

FOOTNOTES
(1) Some Doubts about the Enlil-Yahweh-vibe
(2) Is it Blasphemous to Say God is an Alien?
(3) Enki’s account on the Destruction of Atlantis
(4) Enlil would have faced justice in some interstellar trial: see Anu, Enlil, Enki and the Meeting with the Four Councils
(5) Trying to Understand Enki’s Genetic Template Grail
(6) The Teachings of Jacob
(7) Danaan, E. (2022) The Seeders – See the chapter The Royal Bloodlines – Genealogy of Yeshua (pp 515-519)
(8) Luke 3:38 (Bible Hub) On this website you can get all kinds of translations and versions of this verse. I could detect one version that actually talks about Jesus and his link to Adam. Below are a few of them:

American Standard Version
the son of Enos, the son of Seth, the son of Adam, the son of God.

Aramaic Bible in Plain English
Son of Enosh, son of Shayth, son of Adam, who was from God.

Contemporary English Version
Enosh, and Seth. The family of Jesus went all the way back to Adam and then to God.

Douay-Rheims Bible
Who was of Henos, who was of Seth, who was of Adam, who was of God.

English Revised Version
the son of Enos, the son of Seth, the son of Adam, the son of God.

(9) Our Intergalactic and Genetic Genomes
(10) As far as I understand it, Enki first hybridized human beings with Anunnaki genomes and the genomes of the primates that had those genomes of the Seeders hidden in them. This was done 372,000 years BC (see 6, 495), afterwards at about 360,000 BC he decided to actively add his own genome to the whole, creating the Adamic man. (see 6, 496). Am I correct in concluding that everyone that was born out of this adamic ‘product’ can be said to be part of the Enki bloodline? Or is there a more specific bloodline that Elena Danaan is referring to when she speaks of Enki’s bloodline? Or did Enlil kill off most of this bloodline?

For if humanity would mainly come from Enki’s ‘second experiment’ than most of humanity would be of Enki’s bloodline, wouldn’t it? And what did Enlil do to this ‘divine man’? He somehow managed to shake up the whole genetic household of these humans to make them a rather simple ‘2-stranded human’ that would mainly be used to work for and obey Enlil and his men. If the DNA is shaken up, does that imply that Enki’s bloodline is gone, or just mixed up?

If Enki says he is the “Father” of humanity wouldn’t this imply that we all carry his bloodline in a way? Thinking too much about this gives me a headache, so I’ll leave it at this. If you have anything to explain all this better, please comment below this article.

(11) Let’s Talk About Hermaphrodite Species from Outer Space
(12) On the Origin of the Asian People
(13) The Mu-Mystery – Exploring Lemuria
(14) Desmarquet, M. (1993) The Thiaoouba Prophecy. You can buy the paperback at amazon, or you can download the pdf. For the Chinese community I recommend the work of Samuel ChongOn February 16, 2023 Dr. Salla had an interview with Samuel at: Thiaoouba Prophesy – Contact with a Hermaphrodite ET Race
(15) The Gospel and the Virgin Birth
(16) Elena Danaan doesn’t specify by whom Mary would have been impregnated. Which Stellar race was this? It couldn’t have been the Anunnaki from Nibiru because Nibiru was in the hands of the Enlil faction, and Enki had left Earth right after the flood, some 9600 B.C.
(17) This changed in March 2023. Elena told the Japanese Mariko Kamimura what was the soul origin of Jesus. Read all about it in this article: On Jesus, Jehovah, the Hoova and Thioouba . In order to better ‘house’ this soul whose origin would be somewhere in the Hoova galaxy, additional Hoova genes were probably added during the ‘in vitro impregnation’ (see for more on that webinar 2, at about 2h08′).