Illustration of a man with a light on its forehead (19)
The study of extraterrestrial species isn’t easy at this stage. We rarely see hard evidence and most of the time we just have to take someone’s word for it. We have testimonies of people that we can compare and we can test the internal consistency when certain people produce a lot of information. So, I have learned to accept that we are dealing with ‘possible realities’, and time will tell which accounts turn out to be true and which are false, or made up or distorted, consciously or unconsciously. It is all up to the reader to determine what they are willing to accept as a possible truth or not.
This article is built around a feature that you probably haven’t come across before in your surroundings, namely the ability of a particular species to actually produce a light that shines from their forehead. Let’s see what this is all about.
TWO KOLDAS ACCOUNTS This website uses the Elena Danaan as its main hypothesis because of its great internal consistency and its wide range of information. This, however, doesn’t mean that we treat it as the ultimate truth. On this website you can find information from other sources as well. The current article is based on an account by a woman called Beverli Rhodes (1) who was related to the South African group, whose main contact, Edwin/Edward, has been communicating with people from a planet called Koldas. A book was written on this by Carl van Vlierden (2). I have processed this book in the past and you can find elements of it in various articles (3-7). These contacts happened for decades starting from the early 1960s.
So, we have this book on Koldas that was written in 1986, but in 2025 Elena Danaan published a book on Koldas as well (8)! Isn’t that a fascinating thing, right? Are they talking about the same people, the same planet? In our Study Group we have attempted to compare elements of both accounts and we have noticed some similarities and differences (9). This, however, is not the the aim of this article.
A LIGHT COMING FROM THE FOREHEAD In June 2026, Dani Henderson did an interview with contactee Beverli Rhodes (10,11). Rhodes describes a man from Koldas who has visited South Africa in the 20th century. In the excerpt below you can watch how she witnessed this man emitting a light from his ‘third eye’ at will.
Beverli Rhodes describes how she saw ‘Jacques’ displaying his ability to produce light from his forehead (9)
SOME REFLECTIONS We have seen many awkward elements during the nearly five years that this project exists. We have heard of extraterrestrials who could even shine light out of their eyes, like the blue-skinned Vyn from the Auriga Constellation (13) or the Dries (14). We have heard about the ability of certain species to change the color of their eyes (15) and even to look through somebody else’s eyes (16). I am also reminded about that species that would have a special gland at their hip that they eat from occasionally (17).
When I started working on this Galactic Anthropology website my main intention was to document the information in such a way that it would be easily accessible for a bigger public. As you all know by now, I was inspired by the work of Elena Danaan and I also incorporated a number of other contactees and other people with galactic information on this website. I like to explore these new worlds and I also like to ask questions.
Curiosity (9)
CURIOSITY & BACKLASH As I have expressed in earlier articles this curiosity had some effects that I hadn’t foreseen (1,2). I learned that asking questions could be interpreted as attacks or as dark ways of finding faults in someone’s work. As if studying someone’s material implies that you should not ask any critical questions. I was – and still am – confident that Elena Danaan’s work is robust enough to withstand critical scrutiny, and of course with such a huge amount of new disclosure information, it would be perfectly fine to learn and adapt certain concepts as they develop.
After having been banned from certain groups because of asking questions, I openly wondered if Elena’s deal with High Commander Ardaana from the Galactic Federation of Worlds about the free flow of information was still holding after Elena decided to introduce webinars (3). Elena herself stepped in and threw in her full weight to condemn me for suggesting that she was putting up a paywall for her information, although I still think this is a pretty obvious fact (4).
This triggered some 50 people to immediately unsubscribe from my telegram channel (6) and many people openly started treating me as if I was some agent of the Dark with evil and destructive intentions. There were people who kept on quoting Elena’s words, whenever I spoke in a certain Telegram group, and they wondered why I was still allowed to remain in that group. The logical thing was to remove and cancel me into oblivion, because Elena had spoken.
I also received support and I especially liked the following video that someone posted from an unknown man who gave a calm and collected analysis of group dynamics in connection with contactees. The video takes about 8 minutes to watch, but it will be worth your time when you are interested in this topic.
Interesting Perspective on Group Dynamics related to Contactees (13)
Well, I continued to write articles, for I think the information from Elena Danaan is far too important to get caught up in all this chatter. I also didn’t loose my respect for Elena; everybody can get a bit tense sometimes and there is always a human part to her, even when she is an emissary for the GFW. I still love her, and her work.
MY ALIENS ARE BETTER THAN YOUR ALIENS But then the story continued into yet another realm that I hadn’t foreseen. I like the contactee/SSP (Secret Space Program) group that was formed around Dani’s Galactic Spiritual Informers Connection (7); you could call them the GSIC-team. I feature a lot of articles from people of that team, like Elena Danaan, Dr. Michael Salla, Alex Collier, Jean-Charles Moyen, Rebecca Rose, Chris O’Connor, Tony Rodrigues. I cherish their stories, but I also noticed a desire to get to know other contactees as well, and to listen to what they have to say.
One element in this decision was that I didn’t really like the way Dani kept on pushing the GSIC and their members as the only ones presenting the absolute truth. Below is an introduction by Dani which exemplifies this sentiment (and mind you, this is only my personal sentiment as writer of this website, make up your own mind) (25 seconds)
Dani Henderson on the GSIC (8)
So, I started to look around a bit more and produced a few articles with people not directly associated with Dani’s group. I introduced people to this website like Lily Nova, Daryl James, Beth Noyes, Debbie Solaris, Omnec Omec, Anja Schäfer and Viviane Chauvet.
But then something interesting happened. People started to get annoyed because I introduced Viviane Chauvet. Viviane Chauvet says she is an Acturian-Human hybrid and I thought that to be quite interesting to study: what would she have to say? How does it relate to the Elena Danaan material and Dani’s group? But it appeared that Viviane was canceled by Elena in the past too. This implied that just by talking about her, or by studying her perspective, I was in effect dancing with the ‘enemy’.
While watching a video in which Viviane appeared (10) that deals with Marina Seren who wanted to warn people against the Essassani and their attempts to infiltrate humanity with Gray-hybrids (11), a guy called Tyler Ellison said something interesting about this tendency to have all kinds of opposing groups within the disclosure movement (16 seconds):
Tyler Ellison, a man who promotes the questionable Gray-human hybridization program, talks about trust and distrust in certain spiritual communities (10))
I don’t think Covid has a lot to do with it, but I did notice that my freedom to explore was also cut short because apparently there are all kinds of people that should be avoided at all costs, and if you do associate with them, people might think of you joining the enemy or some distorted perspective aimed at creating chaos and disinformation. It reminded me of what Tony Rodrigues said in a recent interview with Alisha Braché about this animosity between certain disclosure groups: (almost 2 minutes)
Tony Rodrigues talks to Alisha Braché on the incredible vastness of species in the universe (12)
CONCLUDING REMARKS Although I started Galactic Anthropology because I wanted to archive the material that was brought forward by Elena Danaan and the group that she interacts with, I want to feel free to explore the testimonies of other people too. I want to be free to ask questions related to Elena’s material, but also to that of other people. I intend to go on and listen to people like Viviane Chauvet and anyone else I might encounter as long as I think it is genuine, insightful and interesting.
If you prefer to remain on the safe side you might decide to skip any future article that deals with people that are canceled by Dani’s group. Elena Danaan’s fascinating material will remain the foundation of this website, but I don’t want to be restricted in studying the fascinating testimonies of other people because someone else says so. This is not to say that I will start studying just about anyone, for I also have my group of sources that I prefer to ignore, but that would be because I myself have come to this conclusion, and I take Elena’s debunk (14) list very seriously (15-18).
Please share your thoughts below or in the Galactic Anthropology Study Group (19)
About Tyler Ellison. I didn’t know him at all, but a contact of mine informed me about him. It turns out that he is actively channeling some being called ‘Ryo’ who is still propagating this hybridization agenda. In a video from March 2023 (4D Earth – Preparing for Contact – Meeting the Hybrids Halfway | Ryo – Channeled by Tyler Ellison) he fervently talks about us meeting these gray-human hybrids half way in 4D. Apparently there still are people who are attuned to this mode of thinking, even though the new amendment of the Prime Directive (20) makes it impossible for them to ever get their ‘hybrid boots on the ground’. Make up your own mind, but I would advise you to read (21,22) which deal about the negative sides of this hybrid agenda.
My interest for this topic of disclosure, and the possibility of all these alien races coming from all corners of the universe, was triggered by Elena’s second book. I didn’t take me long to order her first book and I got hooked to all the information pouring forth through her youtube-videos. At first I followed her and Dr. Michael Salla, but during the months I got to know other people who said that they had been (and some say still are) part of a Secret Space Program. A kind of team was formed with people who had corroborating stories. I use their testimonies on this website (1).
A Bouquet (18)
A SMALL GROUP This is a relatively small group of people and they all know each other quite well. Most of them spoke at the Galactic Spiritual Informers Conference in Orlando in October 2022 (2). They appear in interviews with Dr. Salla and with Elena Danaan and are a valuable source of information. I have called this group of people ‘the Team’ a few times. Members of this ‘team’ do interviews with other people and sometimes they appear in meetings with other people who share their own Secret Space Program experiences, who are not part of this ‘team’.
As a researcher I would love to expand this team of contacts with many more contactees, for it would be great to have many people all sharing their insights, their experiences in order to corroborate and expand the horizons of our knowledge on these extraterrestrial beings and their interactions with either the positive or the negative factions on our planet.
FINDING TRUSTWORTHY CONTACTEES When you take a look at the youtube channel of James Rink (3) you can see dozens of people – most of them unfamiliar to me – who all share their experiences with either extraterrestrials or with all kinds of Secret (underground) programs. You could spend a lifetime listening to all their testimonies. I don’t have that much time available and keeping up with the updates and going through the older information from the established team takes up most of my time already.
OPENING UP TO OTHER CONTACTEES Despite this situation I do pay attention to other people sometimes, but I have come to realize that this is a tricky thing. In a way it’s far more comfortable to just stick to this relatively small group. For me, Mark Domizio, was a great asset with compelling information (4). This positive expansion of the team led me to become more open to other people, and the latest person that caught my attention was Daryl James.
THE CASE OF DARYL JAMES It was during a round table interview that was organized by Alisha Braché with Rebecca Rose and Tony Rodrigues that I got to meet Daryl James (5). It was mainly because of his interesting take on the role of Russia (6), with seemed to affirm Rebecca Rose’s recent memories of her Montauk period that I decided to listen to his personal testimony. I started adding fragments of his testimonies to certain pages and I even started to write new articles based on his account , with intriguing topics surrounding the collapse of the Deep State and his interactions with what he called ‘Taygetans’ (7,8).
It is tempting to treat people like Daryl James as if they are part of this ‘team’ and as a consequence take their testimonies quite seriously, resulting in the analysis of certain aspects in a host of new articles, with an interweaving with the rest of the material. This is all very well when the material is solid, but when there are a number of aspects that turn out to be rather strange and even at odds with the material of other members of this team, it can become rather complicated and it might end up clouding and muddling the rest of the information. This of course is an undesirable situation.
ASSEMBLING YOUR OWN BOUQUET OF CONTACTS The easiest thing would then be to simply disconnect from those persons altogether, like I have decided to disconnect from people like Megan Rose (9), Ismael Perez (10) and Mary (11). There is also a group of sources that present compelling information, but of which I’m not yet sure to what extent they provide true information. Perhaps some elements are true, and some are not. I suppose sources like Ashayana Deane (12) , Patricia Cori (13), Radu Cinamar (14) and Michel Desmaquet and his Thiaoouba Prophecy (15,16) belong to this category.
On top of all this, there also are those group psychology effects (17) which almost seem to prescribe what and who you are allowed to follow, and even the material in the Seeders activates certain questions that have not yet been fully solved. All in all you could say that is quite a task to navigate through all of this, especially when you only have your own sense of discernment, which is far from unfallible. I guess there should be some kind of balance in exploring new testimonies and sticking to the ones that have proven their worth in the past.
Tell me all about your travels through this world of dozens of contactees with all of their testimonies that often collide with each other in the comments below.
Galactic Anthropology 